<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Superior Cleansing  &#187; Toxins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://superiorcleansing.com/tag/toxins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://superiorcleansing.com</link>
	<description>Cleanse For Life!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 03:40:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fat Epidemic/Obesity Linked To Chemicals Run Amok</title>
		<link>http://superiorcleansing.com/fat-epidemicobesity-linked-to-chemicals-run-amok/</link>
		<comments>http://superiorcleansing.com/fat-epidemicobesity-linked-to-chemicals-run-amok/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Iacono</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Isagenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti Aging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fat Epidemic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superiorcleansing.com/?p=3403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We don&#8217;t use that polite phrase any longer. What changed? Now that about two-thirds of American adults are overweight or obese, did those folks with &#8220;glandular problems&#8221; disappear? No; it&#8217;s just that many others have caught the same disease. Thanks to the obesogen effect, we may all be at risk for some glandular problems. Because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 15px; width:240px;">
		<img src="http://superiorcleansing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/better-burger.jpg" width="240" />
		</p><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p><a href="http://superiorcleansing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/better-burger.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-3404 alignleft" title="better-burger" src="http://superiorcleansing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/better-burger-300x175.jpg" alt="Fat Burger Toxins" width="300" height="175" /></a>We don&#8217;t use that polite phrase any longer. What changed? Now that about two-thirds of American adults are overweight or obese, did those folks with &#8220;glandular problems&#8221; disappear? No; it&#8217;s just that many others have caught the same disease. Thanks to the obesogen effect, we may all be at risk for some glandular problems.</p>
<p>Because it&#8217;s probably been a while since you took high-school anatomy, here&#8217;s a quick refresher: Your endocrine system is the contingent of glands producing the hormones that regulate your body. Growth and development, sexual function, reproductive processes, mood, sleep, hunger, stress, metabolism — they&#8217;re all controlled by hormones. And the pancreas, hypothalamus, adrenal glands, thyroid, pituitary gland, and testes are all part of that system. So whether you&#8217;re male or female, tall or short, hirsute or hairless, lean or heavy — that&#8217;s all determined in a big way by your endocrine system.</p>
<p>Your endocrine system is a finely tuned instrument that can easily be thrown out of kilter. &#8220;Obesogens are thought to act by hijacking the regulatory systems that control body weight,&#8221; says Frederick vom Saal, Ph.D., curators&#8217; professor of biological sciences at the University of Missouri. &#8220;And any chemical that interferes with body weight is an endocrine disruptor.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why obesogens seem to be good at making us fat — and why researchers are so bent on uncovering the truth about these chemicals. The NIEHS is funding studies that target them. The Endocrine Society, the largest organization for hormone research and clinical endocrinology, has also noted the connection. &#8220;The rise in the incidence in obesity matches the rise in the use and distribution of industrial chemicals that may be playing a role in generation of obesity,&#8221; it stated in a recent report, &#8220;suggesting that EDCs may be linked to this epidemic.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s one reason why weight-loss advice may not always work. In fact, even strictly following the smartest traditional advice won&#8217;t lower your obesogen exposure. See, an apple a day may have kept the doctor away 150 years ago. But if that apple now comes with chemicals believed to promote obesity, then that advice is way out of date. In fact, apples have been named one of the most pesticide-laden produce choices out there.</p>
<p>The obesogen effect may be part of the reason why traditional dieting practices — choosing chicken over beef, eating more fish, loading up on fruits and vegetables — may not work anymore.</p>
<p>But as we began researching our book, &#8220;The New American Diet,&#8221; we found some good news: There&#8217;s no reason why our favorite foods — steak, burgers, pasta, ice cream — can&#8217;t be part of a reasonable weight-loss program. We just need to move past the old thinking, and adopt some new laws of leanness.</p>
<p><strong>Leanness law #1: Know when to go organic<br />
</strong>Every day the average American is exposed to an estimated 10 to 13 different pesticides and/or their metabolites (breakdown products) through food, beverages, and <a id="itxthook1" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35315651/ns/health-diet_and_nutrition/t/fat-epidemic-linked-chemicals-run-amok/#" rel="nofollow">drinking water</a>.</p>
<p>Some of those chemicals can mimic estrogen during development, which can lead to weight gain later in life. Others can spur unnecessary fat-cell formation at any age. At the University of California at Irvine, Bruce Blumberg, Ph.D., recently reported that prenatal exposure to obesogens among mice can predispose them to weight gain later in life. The effect is likely the same in humans. In one study, the adult daughters of women who had the highest levels of DDE (a breakdown product of the pesticide DDT) in their blood during childbearing years were found to be 20 pounds heavier, on average, than daughters of women who had the least.</p>
<p>And the evidence continues to accumulate.</p>
<ul>
<li>Researchers have noted a link between organochlorine pesticides and impaired thyroid function. According to the Endocrine Society&#8217;s 2009 report on EDCs, changes in thyroid function can result in metabolic effects. Indeed, the authors of a 2009 Thyroid Research article cited hypothyroidism, a symptom of which can be weight gain, as a possible effect of organochlorines on the thyroid.</li>
<li>The authors of a study in the journal BioScience found that tributyltin, a fungicide, activates components in human cells known as retinoid X receptors, which are part of the metabolic pathway necessary for fat-cell formation. They also found that tributyltin causes the growth of fat cells in mice exposed to it. Although tributyltin is no longer used on crops, experts suspect that a similar compound still used on produce, fenbutatin, is at least as potent.</li>
<li>The authors of a recent study in Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology note that organophosphates and carbamates, two common classes of pesticides, cause obesity in animals.</li>
</ul>
<p>But there is some hopeful research; a study in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives found that children who ate fruits and vegetables free of organophosphorous pesticides for just 5 days reduced their urine concentrations of those pesticides to undetectable levels.</p>
<p><a> Video: Organic food: A fresh approach to health? </a></p>
<p>According to the Environmental Working Group, you can reduce your pesticide exposure by nearly 80 percent simply by choosing organic versions of the 12 fruits and vegetables shown in its tests to contain the highest pesticide load. The group calls them the Dirty Dozen: In order of pesticide load, they are peaches, apples, bell peppers, celery, nectarines, strawberries, cherries, kale, lettuce, imported grapes, carrots, and pears. There&#8217;s a Clean Fifteen, too, a group of conventionally grown fruits and vegetables with the least pesticide residue: onions, avocados, sweet corn, pineapples, mangoes, asparagus, sweet peas, kiwis, cabbages, eggplants, papayas, watermelons, broccoli, tomatoes, and sweet potatoes. No matter what kind of produce you&#8217;re buying, <a href="http://www.menshealth.com/mhlists/how_to_pick_the_best_produce/?cm_mmc=MSNBC-_-100127-New%20America%20Diet-_-Article-_-Lists%20How%20to%20pick%20the%20best%20produce">use this guide to pick the perfect fruit and vegetables at your grocery store or farmer&#8217;s market</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Leanness law #2: Stop eating plastic<br />
</strong>You&#8217;re thinking, Well, I don&#8217;t generally eat plastic.</p>
<p>Ah, but you do.</p>
<p>Chances are you&#8217;re among the 93 percent of Americans with detectable levels of bisphenol A (BPA) in their bodies, and you&#8217;re also among the 75-plus percent of Americans with detectable levels of phthalates in their urine. Both of these synthetic chemicals, found in plastics, mimic estrogen. And like some pesticides, these chemicals can predispose your body from an early age to gain fat.</p>
<p>How do they end up inside you? Mostly through what you eat and drink: Phthalates can be found in food packaging, plastic wraps, and pesticides, as well as children&#8217;s toys, PVC pipe, and medical supplies. Each year, about 18 billion pounds of phthalate esters are created worldwide, and they can easily leach into your body.</p>
<p>More than 6 billion pounds of BPA, found in polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins, is produced every year; it leaches from food and drink packaging, baby bottles, cans, and bottle tops. Pop the top off a jar of tomato sauce and check out the resin on the inside of the cap — that&#8217;s where the BPA comes from.</p>
<p><a> Video: BPA in canned foods? </a> A recent study published on BPA&#8217;s effects on humans found that workers exposed to BPA at Chinese factories had more than four times the risk of erection difficulties. (Japan reduced the use of BPA in cans between 1998 and 2003; as a result, measures of BPA in some Japanese populations dropped more than 50 percent.) According to the Environmental Working Group, canned chicken soup, infant formula, and ravioli have BPA levels of the highest concern. And your sturdy reusable <a id="itxthook2" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35315651/ns/health-diet_and_nutrition/t/fat-epidemic-linked-chemicals-run-amok/#" rel="nofollow">water bottle</a>? After people drank out of a polycarbonate bottle (usually stamped with a 7 on the bottom) for just 1 week, their BPA levels jumped by nearly 70 percent, according to a seminal study from Harvard University and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how you can limit your exposure.</p>
<ul>
<li>Follow vom Saal&#8217;s rule: &#8220;No plastic item ever goes into the oven or the microwave.&#8221; Heat can damage plastic and increase leaching.</li>
<li>Avoid plastic-wrapped meat. &#8220;The plastic wrap used at the supermarket is mostly PVC, whereas the plastic wrap you buy to wrap things at home is increasingly made from polyethylene,&#8221; vom Saal says. PVC contains phthalates that, according to animal studies, may lower testosterone levels. In humans, lower testosterone leads to weight gain as well as a decrease in muscle mass and sex drive. Go to a butcher who uses paper instead.</li>
<li>Cut down on canned goods like tuna, and buy frozen vegetables in bags instead of canned produce. Consider buying Eden Foods canned beans and jarred foods, which are in BPA-free packaging.</li>
<li>Use a nonplastic mug whenever you can. And for good measure, avoid drinking coffee or other hot beverages out of Styrofoam, which can leach styrene, a compound linked to cancer.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Leanness law #3: Don’t eat the Viking<br />
</strong>When was the last time you took a dose of weight-promoting hormones?</p>
<p>Okay, when was the last time you ate a burger?</p>
<p>The answer to both questions may well be the same. Every time you eat conventionally grown beef, there&#8217;s a chance you&#8217;re eating weight-gain hormones — a potential cocktail of natural and synthetic obesogens. In fact, a report in the International Journal of Obesity by researchers at 10 universities, including Yale, Johns Hopkins, and Cornell, notes that the use of hormones in meat could be a contributing factor to the obesity epidemic.</p>
<p>A 1999 European study concluded that people who eat meat from cattle treated with growth hormones are taking in hormones and their metabolites: estrogens in the range of 1 to 84 nanograms per person per day, progesterone (64 to 467 ng), and testosterone (5 to 189 ng).</p>
<p>A nanogram is a billionth of a gram: That&#8217;s tiny. But it may be enough to disrupt the way your hormone system operates, research indicates. Some experts believe that certain obesogens exert influence at below 1 part per billion. And small amounts from many sources add up over time.</p>
<p>Perhaps even more worrisome are the potent synthetic steroids we ingest from beef. Trenbolone acetate is an anabolic steroid estimated to be eight to 10 times as potent as testosterone, which is an endocrine-disrupting chemical by definition. &#8220;This cocktail of hormones given to beef has huge consequences,&#8221; vom Saal says. We know what happens to the body when it receives large doses of steroids over a short period of time, but there is no research on the effects of small doses over years.</p>
<p>To bring this all home, imagine you&#8217;ve been in a terrible plane crash in the Andes, like those poor souls depicted in the movie &#8220;Alive.&#8221; The only way to survive is to pick one of the dead folks to eat. You&#8217;re given the choice of an obese, grotesquely muscled, man-boob-toting Minnesota Vikings lineman with shrunken testicles who&#8217;s been injecting himself with hormones for a dozen years, or someone of normal size and body type and hormonal function. (One of the Kardashian sisters, maybe.) Which would you choose?</p>
<p>Well, every time you eat conventionally raised beef, you&#8217;re choosing the Viking.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a better way. Organic beef has none of the weight-promoting steroid hormones of conventional beef, while grass-fed beef has been found to have more omega-3s and more conjugated linoleic acid (CLA). CLA is a fatty-acid mixture that&#8217;s been linked to protection against cardiovascular disease and <a id="itxthook3" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35315651/ns/health-diet_and_nutrition/t/fat-epidemic-linked-chemicals-run-amok/#" rel="nofollow">diabetes</a>; it can also help you lose weight, according to a meta-analysis in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.</p>
<p>Similarly, conventionally raised dairy cows are often given hormones to produce more milk, which may lead to some nutrient dilution. Grass grazing, however, may increase omega-3 content in milk. By choosing to eat and drink more omega-3s, more CLA, and more nutrients, you&#8217;re choosing to fill your body with more nutrition — feeding your brain, fueling weight loss, and keeping hunger at bay.</p>
<p><strong>Leanness law #4: Beware of the sneaky saboteurs<br />
</strong>Ingesting pesticides, growth hormones, and plastic-based chemicals obviously isn&#8217;t a good idea. But other, sneakier obesogens are at work. We&#8217;re talking about high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and soy, which are added into your diet and the diet of the animals you eat, and which carry or are converted into natural obesogens.</p>
<p>But wait: Isn&#8217;t soy good for your heart? Not necessarily. A review in the American Heart Association&#8217;s journal Circulation notes that soy protein can lower LDL cholesterol, but only a measly 3 percent. You&#8217;d have to eat the equivalent of 2 pounds of tofu a day to reap that benefit. As a result, the AHA withdrew support for definitive health claims for soy protein and coronary heart disease. Yet soy is in hiding in everything from cookies to french fries to salad dressing.</p>
<p>The result of all that extra soy could be — get ready for it — more fat. This is particularly true for people who were given soy-based formula as infants. You see, soy contains two naturally occurring chemicals, genistein and daidzein, both of which are estrogenics, which can spur the formation of fat cells.</p>
<p>But wait! Guess who else is on a soy diet? Elsie, Wilbur, and Chicken Little — the animals we depend on for food. (Many fish, too, are chowing down on soy.) Chickens that once ate natural grasses and forage now feed on a high-energy diet of which soybean meal is a large component.</p>
<p>According to British researchers, this type of diet is partly to blame for the fact that some modern chickens contain two to three times as many calories from fat as from protein. (That&#8217;s right: The chicken&#8217;s proportion of muscle is dropping, just like ours! Sounds like the obesogen effect.)</p>
<p>So when you eat modern, supermarket chicken and beef you&#8217;re eating more fat, less protein, and more obesogens.</p>
<p>High-fructose corn syrup, too, has been fingered by some experts as a possible player in the obesity crisis. HFCS is found in countless items, from bread to ketchup to Life Savers to cough medicine. Recent research indicates that a diet high in HFCS may trick your brain into craving more food even when you don&#8217;t need it. And preliminary research indicates that HFCS may even play a role in disrupting the endocrine system, says Robert Lustig, M.D., a pediatric endocrinologist at UCSF. In overweight people, it interferes with leptin, a hormone that regulates appetite.</p>
<p>Is all this a bit disturbing? You bet. Depressing? Not at all. Because you can reconsider the old weight-loss advice — the &#8220;diet wisdom&#8221; that told you to stop eating burgers, pasta, and ice cream — and go back to eating what you love. Of course you should eat reasonably-sized portions. But the key is to eat natural, obesogen-free versions. Do this while keeping up your exercise program and over time you&#8217;ll see results. Your waistline, your tastebuds, and even your muscles and libido will thank you.</p>
<p><em>Adapted from &#8220;The New American Diet&#8221; (Rodale 2009), available at bookstores and at </em><a href="http://www.newamericandietbook.com/uof/newamericandietbook/"><em>NewAmDiet.com</em></a><em>. </em></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-3403"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->
<p class="FacebookLikeButton"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fsuperiorcleansing.com%2Ffat-epidemicobesity-linked-to-chemicals-run-amok%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;locale=en_US" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height: 60px"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superiorcleansing.com/fat-epidemicobesity-linked-to-chemicals-run-amok/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reform of Toxic Chemicals Law Collapses as Industry Flexes Its Muscles</title>
		<link>http://superiorcleansing.com/reform-of-toxic-chemicals-law-collapses-as-industry-flexes-its-muscles/</link>
		<comments>http://superiorcleansing.com/reform-of-toxic-chemicals-law-collapses-as-industry-flexes-its-muscles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 01:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Iacono</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Health Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fire Retardants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nano-Particles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superiorcleansing.com/?p=2431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article by investigative journalist Sheila Kaplan is the first in a series supported by the Investigative Reporting Workshop at American University&#8217;s School of Communication. Politics Daily will publish the remaining installments in the weeks to come. Fire retardants in baby blankets, nano-particles in cosmetics, plastics in water bottles and anti-bacterial agents in soaps. Experts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><div><em>This article by investigative journalist Sheila Kaplan is the first in a <a href="http://investigativereportingworkshop.org/investigations/toxic-influence/story/reform-toxic-substances-law-collapses/" target="_blank">series</a> supported by the <a href="http://investigativereportingworkshop.org/">Investigative Reporting Workshop </a>at <a href="http://www.american.edu/soc/partnerships/investigative-reporting-workshop.cfm">American University&#8217;s School of Communication</a>. Politics Daily will publish the remaining installments in the weeks to come.</em></div>
<div></div>
<div><a rel="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/10/13/reform-of-toxic-chemicals-law-collapses-as-industry-flexes-its-m/" href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/10/13/reform-of-toxic-chemicals-law-collapses-as-industry-flexes-its-m/" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2433" title="pd-investigations-header" src="http://superiorcleansing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/pd-investigations-header1.jpg" alt="Toxic Investigations" width="550" height="92" /></a></p>
<p>Fire retardants in baby blankets, <a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/02/18/nanoparticles-block-uv-rays-and-stop-mold-but-the-environment/">nano-particles in cosmetics</a>, plastics in water bottles and anti-bacterial agents in soaps.</p>
<p>Experts call these and other chemicals<a href="http://www.epa.gov/esd/bios/pdf/contaminants-biosolids2.pdf"> emerging contaminants</a> &#8212; compounds that were once thought to be safe, but which scientists now believe may pose a danger to human health.</div>
<div>
How those chemicals get into your house &#8212; and your bloodstream &#8212; is no  surprise: Loopholes in the federal law that regulates toxic chemicals  have allowed manufacturers to sell them without first proving they are  safe.</div>
<div>
In recent years, however, dozens of studies &#8212; many funded by the federal government &#8212; have shown that <a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/10/13/red-flagged-chemicals-and-you-a-glossary-of-terms/">chemicals that are ubiquitous in the environment </a>and  in consumer goods can cause cancer, wreak havoc on hormones, damage the  developing brain, depress the immune system and alter gene  expression-among other problems. Earlier this year, the President&#8217;s  Cancer Panel <a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/05/12/cancer-panel-chemicals-grossly-underestimated-as-carcinogens/">reported</a>,  &#8220;The true burden of environmentally induced cancers has been grossly  underestimated.&#8221; And Linda Birnbaum, director of the National Institute  of Environmental Health Sciences, which funded many of the top studies, <a href="http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/2009/12/t20091202a.html">told Congress</a>,  &#8220;Research has revealed the heightened vulnerability of fetal, infant  and child development processes to disruption from relatively low doses  of certain chemicals.&#8221; Birnbaum, like EPA chief Lisa Jackson, urged  Congress to revamp the federal law that regulates toxic chemicals,  giving the agency greater authority to protect the public.</div>
<div>
<img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.politicsdaily.com/media/2010/10/plastic-water-bottles-427jf101210.jpg" border="1" alt="" hspace="4" vspace="4" />Last  fall, a group of congressional Democrats vowed to overhaul the  34-year-old Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to make it easier for  EPA to take dangerous chemicals off the market and ensure that the  substitutes are safe. But one year, six congressional hearings and 10  &#8220;stakeholder sessions&#8221; later, the bills are dead, a testament to the  combined clout of $674 billion chemical industry, the companies that  process their compounds into air fresheners, detergents, perfumes,  cosmetics, toys, medical devices and other consumer goods, and the  stores that sell them. Their campaign to block reform of the Toxic  Substances Control Act won out over EPA&#8217;s support, an unprecedented  campaign by public health advocates fueled by the industry&#8217;s own  admissions that the current law does not fully protect public health.</div>
<div>
<div>
<h3>See Also:</h3>
</div>
<div>
<ul><strong> </strong></p>
<li><span style="color: #800000;"><strong>Chemical &#8216;Warfare&#8217; : <a title="POLITICSDAILY - Nevada's Sharron Angle Raises $14 Million in Third Quarter" href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/10/13/chemical-warfare-whos-who-and-whats-at-stake/" target="_blank">Who&#8217;s Who and What&#8217;s at Stake</a></strong></span></li>
<p><span style="color: #800000;"><strong> </strong></span></p>
<li><span style="color: #800000;"><strong>Red-Flagged Chemicals and You: <a title="POLITICSDAILY - Titus vs. Heck in Nevada: Cliffhanger in Nation's Largest House District" href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/10/13/red-flagged-chemicals-and-you-a-glossary-of-terms/" target="_blank">A Glossary of Terms</a></strong></span></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<p>Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.), and Reps. Bobby Rush (D-Ill.) and  Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), who introduced reform bills, say they&#8217;ll  reintroduce them next year. But industry lobbyists will also be back,  making it likely that the stalemate will continue &#8212; even if the  Republicans don&#8217;t gain any additional seats in Congress.</p>
<div>
<strong>Change Seemed Possible</strong></div>
<div><strong><br />
</strong>One year ago, advocates said, the outlook for reform of the  toxic substances act was good. According to interviews with  congressional staff, Lautenberg, Rush and Waxman were optimistic about  winning support. Jackson, the EPA&#8217;s new administrator, announced early  on that strengthening chemical regulation was a top priority. The  industry itself, wary of the patchwork of regulations springing up in  statehouses around the country, which targeted one chemical or another,  said that a uniform federal law might be easier to deal with than 50  separate laws. Some of the chemical companies were already dealing with  new safety regulations adopted in Europe.</div>
<div>
In April, Lautenberg introduced the <a href="http://lautenberg.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=298072">Kid Safe Chemical Act</a>,  and in July, Rush and Waxman followed with the Toxic Chemicals Safety  Act of 2010. The heart of both bills was a shift in accountability to  make chemical companies responsible for proving their products safe  before putting them on the market.</div>
<div>
&#8220;We&#8217;re saying those who make the chemicals . . . ought to be responsible  for testing them first before they&#8217;re released to the public, instead  of having the EPA play detective to search and try to find problems,&#8221;  said Lautenberg. The bills would have required businesses to reveal  which chemicals they are using, and show that there is a &#8220;reasonable  certainty that no harm will result&#8221; from all intended uses over the life  cycle of a chemical. It would also require EPA to consider aggregate  exposure to chemicals from many sources when making a safety  determination, and to take into account vulnerable populations, such as  children or those with immune disorders.</div>
<div>
From spring into summer, Rush and Waxman sponsored 10 &#8220;stakeholder&#8221;  meetings with representatives from EPA, businesses such as DuPont, <a href="http://www.pg.com/en_US/brands/index.shtml">Procter &amp; Gamble</a> and Dow Chemical, and lobbyists from the chemical industry&#8217;s main trade groups, among them:</div>
<div><strong><br />
-</strong> The <a href="http://www.americanchemistry.com/s_acc/sec_directory.asp?CID=250&amp;DID=616" target="_blank">American Chemistry Council</a>, the industry&#8217;s largest alliance;</div>
<div><strong>-</strong> The Society of Chemical Manufacturers and  Affiliates, whose members produce &#8220;batch&#8221; chemicals for use in fire  retardants, pharmaceuticals, agriculture and biotechnology;</div>
<div><strong>-</strong> The <a href="http://www.cspa.org/infocenter/2010/10/cspa-defies-weak-economy-attracts-new-members-sept-29th-2010/" target="_blank">Consumer Specialty Products Association</a>, whose members put their names on products ranging from air fresheners to floor polish;</div>
<div><strong>-</strong> The <a href="http://www.personalcarecouncil.org/members" target="_blank">Personal Care Products Council</a>, which represents cosmetics companies;</div>
<div><strong>-</strong> The Grocery Manufacturers of America.</div>
<div>
It&#8217;s a group that can afford to buy a lot of influence. Federal records  show that in 2009 the chemical industry spent more than $100 million  lobbying Congress and the federal agencies.</div>
<div></div>
<div>In the first six months of 2010 the industry spent more than $40  million on lobbying. Their combined campaign contributions so far in the  current election cycle come to more than $10 million.</p>
<div>
Individual chemical industry lobbyists were also generous (see related <a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/10/13/chemical-warfare-whos-who-and-whats-at-stake/">chart</a>). <a href="http://www.campaignmoney.com/political/contributions/james-massie.asp?cycle=08" target="_blank">James Massie</a>,  who worked on reform for CropLife America, the main trade group for  pesticide companies, donated $104,150, including $58,900 to the  Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. The American Chemistry  Council donated more than $305,000 to federal candidates, plus another  $50,000 to the Democratic Governors Association.</div>
<div>
<a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/08/30/100830fa_fact_mayer?currentPage=all" target="_blank">Koch Industries</a>,  whose subsidiary Georgia Pacific is struggling with proposals to  regulate formaldehyde in its wood products in the face of increasing  evidence of cancer and other health hazards, has donated $1.5 million to  federal candidates so far this cycle, with 86 percent going to  Republican candidates.</div>
<div>
Likewise, Exxon-Mobil has donated 83 percent of its $762,099 to  Republican federal candidates. Procter &amp; Gamble, which is concerned  about the Food and Drug Administration&#8217;s review of several of its  products containing the <a href="http://www.herbalnewsmagazine.com/antibacterial-agent-triclosan-targeted-in-lawsuit/" target="_blank">anti-bacterial agent Triclosan</a>,  as well as reform of the toxic substances act and other issues, has  covered both parties more evenly, giving 56 percent of its $388,878 to  the GOP.</div>
<div>
BASF, which makes Triclosan, has donated more than $250,000 to federal candidates this year.</div>
<div>
The generosity extends to congressional caucuses and their foundations.  Last year, for example, Wal-Mart donated at least $500,000 to the  Congressional Black Caucus Foundation. Wal-Mart lobbies on many issues,  among them the revamping of chemical regulations. This fall&#8217;s  Congressional Black Caucus Foundation annual legislative conference, the  groups&#8217; premier event, drew more than $250,000 from ExxonMobil, and at  least $50,000 from Kraft Foods, a division of Altria (formerly known as  Philip Morris Companies Inc.), which lobbied this year against a Senate  measure to ban BPA in food and beverage containers. Wal-Mart gave  $105,000 more so far this year to the Congressional Black Caucus  Foundation and its legislative conference. Both Wal-Mart and ExxonMobil  are also listed as annual $200,000 donors to the Congressional Hispanic  Caucus Institute.</div>
<div>
The industry&#8217;s clout is more than financial, however. It&#8217;s a rare  congressional district that doesn&#8217;t have a chemical company, processing  plant or major purveyor of consumer goods &#8212; a point made more than once  during the negotiations, and which helped keep some Democrats from  signing onto the bill.</div>
<div>
<strong>Behind Closed Doors</strong></div>
<div><strong><br />
</strong>The stakeholder sessions included representatives from the  environmental and consumer coalitions, but were closed to the press.  Attendees interviewed said that at first EPA and the Democratic staff  believed industry wanted to negotiate, so they conceded some ground,  especially on the thorny issues of regulation of mixtures and treatment  of confidential business information. But as the Democrats began to  appear more vulnerable in the upcoming election, staffers and  environmentalists came to believe industry was trying to run out the  clock.</div>
<div>
&#8220;The [industry] adopted a public stance for reform, so they could have a  seat at the table and try to shape it,&#8221; said Andy Igrejas, national  campaign director of <a href="http://www.saferchemicals.org/about/who.html" target="_blank">Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families</a>,  a well-funded coalition of environmental groups and others working to  tighten chemical regulation. &#8220;At first we were taking them at their word  that we might disagree on what reform looks like, but they were coming  to the table to hash something out. But they just really used the  opportunity to demagogue the bill and get other trade associations to  oppose it.&#8221;</div>
<div>
Igrejas&#8217;s suspicions seemed to be well-founded when Representatives Rush and Waxman <a href="http://energycommerce.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=2095:hearing-on-hr-5820-the-toxic-chemicals-safety-act-of-2010&amp;catid=129:subcommittee-on-commerce-trade-and-consumer-protection&amp;Itemid=70" target="_blank">held a hearing in July</a>.  The expected supporters testified in favor of the bill &#8212; Stephen Owens  from EPA, and Richard Denison, senior scientist with the Environmental  Defense Fund, among others. But former Democratic congressman Calvin  Dooley, who runs the American Chemistry Council, surprised the sponsors  by slamming the bill, calling it unworkable, and making it clear the  industry was nowhere near accepting it.</div>
<div>
&#8220;The safety standard as established in this bill sets an impossibly high  hurdle for all chemicals in commerce that would produce technical,  bureaucratic and commercial barriers that would stifle the manufacturing  sector,&#8221; Dooley said. He added, &#8220;Even more troubling are the provisions  in the bill that would identify chemicals that would be subject to a  safety determination.&#8221; Dooley said a priority list would stigmatize  manufacturers &#8212; a reversal from the chemical council&#8217;s earlier stance.</div>
<div>
Daniel Rosenberg, a longtime attorney for the <a href="http://www.nrdc.org/about/" target="_blank">Natural Resources Defense Council,</a> said advocates for strengthening the bill should have seen it coming.  &#8220;I&#8217;m not sure that industry was ever really for reform,&#8221; he said. &#8220;They  haven&#8217;t proposed anything concrete since they issued a set of principles  more than a year ago, and now they are backing away from those. They  still use the rhetoric of reform, but there doesn&#8217;t seem to be anything  real behind it. Thus far they have said &#8216;no&#8217; to just about everything  proposed in the legislation or by EPA. That shouldn&#8217;t be too surprising,  since they have opposed reforming TSCA for years. They&#8217;ve always said  it works and that &#8216;People are protected, and there is nothing for the  public to be concerned about.&#8217; They were against TSCA reform before they  were for it, and I suspect the conversion, if it ever took place, may  have been short-lived.&#8221;</div>
<div>
One of the biggest boosts for the chemical industry came from<a href="http://www.charlieauer.com/home/about-charlie-3" target="_blank"> Charles Auer</a>,  who retired in January 2009 as head of EPA&#8217;s toxics office. In an  unusual deal between the Democrats and the Republicans on the committee,  Auer was permitted to add a 16-page critique of the bill into the  record after the hearing. Auer echoed Dooley&#8217;s remarks, saying the  proposal was overly burdensome to industry, confusing and would  discourage innovation. He was quick to note that his comments were not  intended to benefit any chemical company clients. But Auer is one of the  chemical industry&#8217;s most important advisers ever to push through the  revolving door between government and industry, having launched a  consulting firm that is an affiliate of Bergeson &amp; Campbell, one of  Washington&#8217;s top chemical industry law-and-lobby shops. (See sidebar for  other revolving door newcomers.)</div>
<div>
&#8220;We hope Charlie will be a very powerful wake-up call,&#8221; said Lynn  Bergeson, a founding member of the firm, regarding Auer&#8217;s written  testimony, which was covered in the trade press, and which identified  him as a former EPA official &#8212; but not an industry consultant.</div>
<div>
Asked if he believed there are hazardous chemicals in commerce right  now, Auer told the workshop, &#8220;My guess is it&#8217;s not a high proportion,  but the fact of the matter is, you don&#8217;t have the data and understanding  to answer those questions,&#8221; he said, meaning no one &#8212; not scientists,  the public or EPA &#8212; knows.</div>
<div>
<div>
Bill Allmond, a lobbyist with the <a href="http://www.socma.com/about/" target="_blank">Society of Chemical Manufacturers</a>,  says his organization supports modernization of the law in theory, but  that the House and Senate bills are probably the worst pieces of  legislation he&#8217;s seen in a decade. &#8220;We had higher expectations, given  the fact that there is a consensus among government and industry, that  this 30-plus-year-old regulation needs to be reformed. After lengthy  conversations with Capitol Hill and the appropriate committees, we still  saw a bill that is extremely unworkable, and would do much more harm  than good.&#8221;</div>
<div>
<strong>A New Strategy</strong></div>
<div><strong><br />
</strong>Supporters of reform concede that EPA has not always made the  most of the legal authority it already has. Some critics note that EPA&#8217;s  penchant for caving in to industry pressure, even when the law  permitted action, is well documented through both Democratic and  Republican administrations. In recent years Congress&#8217; own watchdog  agency, the <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2010-03-17-epa-children-pollution_N.htm" target="_blank">Government Accountability Office, has repeatedly reprimanded EPA officials</a> for failing to set standards on many risky chemicals &#8212; or for setting them too low.</div>
<div>
<a href="http://ewg.org/node/16438" target="_blank">Perchlorate</a>, a  byproduct of rocket fuel and a major source of water pollution, can  alter thyroid hormones; TCE, an agent used as an industrial degreaser,  may cause cancer; atrazine, a pesticide, is a neurotoxicant &#8212; and all  three of these compounds, and others, were caught up in an endless  review cycle for years. The agency also failed over two decades to  recognize that exposure to low levels of lead and mercury were  diminishing the brainpower of generations of American children.</div>
<div>
&#8220;I do think part of the issue was political will,&#8221; said Denison, the  senior scientist at the Environmental Defense Fund, referring to the  combination of loopholes and the lack of a desire to regulate. &#8220;For the  last decade or more, before the new administration came in, the emphasis  has been on voluntary programs. There was a very high hurdle to move  things to a regulatory domain. The new leadership came in and looked at  the core performance of those programs and said, &#8216;We are going to do  everything we can do using our existing authority.&#8217; They are running  into many of the same obstacles, but the political will has changed.&#8221;</div>
<div>
The bleak record prompted states to fill in the gap. Over the past few years, more than 20 states have moved to restrict <a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/06/10/bpa-potential-cancer-causing-agent-found-in-canned-soups/">BPA</a> (bisphenol A, chiefly used in plastic products) or fire retardants.<strong> </strong>In  California last month, the state put the final touches on its Green  Chemistry Initiative, a mini-toxic substances control act designed to  restrict toxic chemicals while encouraging a move to greener  alternatives.</div>
<div>
These state actions may not lead the industry to accept federal  regulations, but they have led to generous campaign contributions to  state candidates, political parties and ballot initiatives. Outside the  Beltway, chemical company interests donated upward of $18.4 million to  state political coffers for election years 2007, 2008, 2009 and 20010,  according to the <a href="http://www.followthemoney.org/Institute/index.phtml" target="_blank">National Institute on Money in State Politics</a>.</div>
<div>
Some of the lobbyists are working on two fronts, in Washington and the state capitals. <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/jennings-resigns/" target="_blank">J. Scott Jennings</a>,  who was White House deputy political director under President George W.  Bush and a longtime deputy to Karl Rove, is now lobbying for Arysta  LifeSciences, the U.S. subsidiary of a Japanese chemical firm that makes  a fumigant called MIDAS, which uses methyl iodide. The chemical was  approved by EPA during the Bush administration despite the protests of  many independent scientists, who sent a petition citing significant  health concerns. The next job for Jennings and his company, Peritus  Public Relations, was to win approval for MIDAS in Sacramento. The lobby  campaign appears to have been successful (they are still awaiting  approval)<span><span><strong>. </strong></span></span>But this summer, California  Democratic Sen. Diane Feinstein contacted EPA, citing concerns about  fetal death, thyroid cancer and neurotoxicity and asking them to revisit  the issue. Feinstein said she has not heard back yet.</div>
</div>
<div>
In meetings this fall, the chemical industry and its allies have made it  clear they will continue to challenge the reform effort. But Lautenberg  remain optimistic. &#8220;I remain committed to working across the aisle to  create a system that ensures the safety of industrial chemicals, and  does so in a way that maintains the U.S. chemical industry&#8217;s leadership  across the globe,&#8221; he said. &#8220;My Safe Chemicals Act first and foremost  protects public health and the environment, but it also recognizes the  need to get new chemicals to market and tailors testing requirements to  avoid unnecessary or duplicative tests. Once I have a Republican partner  in this effort, we can work together on the bill in a way that works  for both industry and for public health.&#8221;</div>
</div>
<div class="shr-publisher-2431"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->
<p class="FacebookLikeButton"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fsuperiorcleansing.com%2Freform-of-toxic-chemicals-law-collapses-as-industry-flexes-its-muscles%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;locale=en_US" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height: 60px"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superiorcleansing.com/reform-of-toxic-chemicals-law-collapses-as-industry-flexes-its-muscles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Ginormous Genetically Modified Antifreeze Salmon Will Change the Future of Your Food</title>
		<link>http://superiorcleansing.com/how-ginormous-genetically-modified-antifreeze-salmon-will-change-the-future-of-your-food/</link>
		<comments>http://superiorcleansing.com/how-ginormous-genetically-modified-antifreeze-salmon-will-change-the-future-of-your-food/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Iacono</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Isagenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aquabounty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salmon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superiorcleansing.com/?p=2369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GM Salmon This week, the FDA will likely decide that AquaBounty is safe for you to buy and eat. Aquawhat? AquaBounty is a salmon—a genetically engineered anti-freeze powered Hulk salmon that will change the future of what you eatGenetically modified food is not new in the US. The odds are pretty good that you&#8217;ve eaten [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><div class="mceTemp">
<dl id="attachment_2370" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://superiorcleansing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/salmon.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2370" title="salmon" src="http://superiorcleansing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/salmon-300x225.jpg" alt="chemicals in salmon" width="300" height="225" /></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd">GM Salmon</dd>
</dl>
<p>This week, the FDA will likely decide that AquaBounty is safe for you to buy and eat. <em>Aquawhat?</em> AquaBounty is a salmon—<a href="http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2010-09/week-fda-mulls-marketing-genetically-engineered-salmon-human-consumption">a genetically engineered anti-freeze powered Hulk salmon</a> that will change the future of what you eatGenetically modified food is not new in the US. The odds are pretty good that you&#8217;ve eaten it recently, if not today—almost all of the soybeans and corn grown in the US sprout from seeds modified to resist pesticides. Genetically modified food is in your cereal, your soda, and your stomach—but only if it&#8217;s growing from the ground. The FDA&#8217;s decision is set to change all that, ushering in a new era of food science. Harder, better, faster, and stronger creatures of all kinds could be heading to your supermarket (and plate) soon.</p>
<p>But back to the salmon. The AquaBounty is modified by introducing two foreign genes from two other fish. Genetically modified food works by finding desirable traits in one animal, and sticking them in the other for a hybridized genetic sequence—a process known as &#8220;recombinant DNA.&#8221; With AquaBounty, the first of two genes its designers had their eyes on is a powerful growth hormone from the Chinook salmon, boosted by pairing it with a gene from the obscure ocean pout, which triggers an always-on biological antifreeze that keeps the salmon growing during the winter. The result is a superfish that never stops growing—reaching full, bulky maturity in 18 months instead of three years. Larger fish that grow faster means more money for farmers, and more food for fish fans. RIght? Well, it&#8217;s not that simple.</p>
<p>On the other end of a debate are an irate league of scientists and food safety advocates who aren&#8217;t sold on the entire concept of GM food—to the extent of calling out the FDA on sloppy, biased science. These skeptics worry about a whole host of potential problems—will GM salmon cause new, unseen allergies and sickness in humans? Will they evolutionarily outcompete and snuff out their non-modified cousins? And will we even know what we&#8217;re exposing ourselves to?—the FDA has already ruled that GM salmon <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/18/AR2010091803808.html">won&#8217;t need to be labeled</a> as such. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/04/health/policy/04salmon.html">The FDA has further concluded</a>, they claim, that we have nothing to worry about health-wise, though critics characterize their testing methodology as laughable, using only a dozen or so sample fish to test check for potential medical complications in humans. Compare this to the EU, where opposition to GM food is so intense that only a dozen or so have been approved in the past decade—a process requiring multinational consensus, not a small panel of experts.</p>
<p>Whether the FDA or its critics are correct, the precedent here will be a significant one. The first step onto our plates will be the most difficult to achieve, and once superfish are taken as a given, the rest of the zoo won&#8217;t be far behind. When fish that are named by trademarks instead of taxonomy are commonplace, it will have changed a fundamental part of eating. Companies and R&amp;D labs, rather than oceans, may someday be the source of our food—a shift that companies like AquaBounty have fought hard for, spending $60 million and a decade to develop the salmon. On paper, the benefits of GM animals are clear. But, like anything else that ends up in our bodies, rigorous deliberation is necessary—maybe enough until both sides are quiet and content.</p>
<p>For original article click here.</p>
</div>
<div class="shr-publisher-2369"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->
<p class="FacebookLikeButton"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fsuperiorcleansing.com%2Fhow-ginormous-genetically-modified-antifreeze-salmon-will-change-the-future-of-your-food%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;locale=en_US" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height: 60px"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superiorcleansing.com/how-ginormous-genetically-modified-antifreeze-salmon-will-change-the-future-of-your-food/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Obesity a Chemical Reaction?</title>
		<link>http://superiorcleansing.com/is-obesity-a-chemical-reaction/</link>
		<comments>http://superiorcleansing.com/is-obesity-a-chemical-reaction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 23:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Iacono</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Isagenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxins and Obesity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superiorcleansing.com/?p=2037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever heard of &#8216;Nutritional Cleansing&#8217;? A new study found overweight young girls had significantly higher levels of phthalates, a chemical found in plastics. Studies are showing increasing evidence there may be a link between certain chemicals and obesity. A new study found overweight young girls had significantly higher levels of phthalates than the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><h2>Have you ever heard of &#8216;Nutritional Cleansing&#8217;?</h2>
<h4><strong>A new study found overweight young girls had significantly higher  levels of phthalates, a chemical found in plastics.</strong></h4>
<p><strong><br />
</strong><br />
<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="540" height="360" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="name" value="PaperVideoTest" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff" /><param name="align" value="middle" /><param name="flashvars" value="&amp;titleAvailable=true&amp;playerAvailable=true&amp;searchAvailable=false&amp;shareFlag=N&amp;singleURL=http://kfor.vidcms.trb.com/alfresco/service/edge/content/cc406e0a-1f40-4da2-8607-625c1b5b265a&amp;propName=kfor.com&amp;hostURL=http://www.kfor.com&amp;swfPath=http://kfor.vid.trb.com/player/&amp;omAccount=triblocaltvglobal&amp;omnitureServer=kfor.com" /><param name="src" value="http://kfor.vid.trb.com/player/PaperVideoTest.swf" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="540" height="370" src="http://kfor.vid.trb.com/player/PaperVideoTest.swf" quality="high" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" flashvars="&amp;titleAvailable=true&amp;playerAvailable=true&amp;searchAvailable=false&amp;shareFlag=N&amp;singleURL=http://kfor.vidcms.trb.com/alfresco/service/edge/content/cc406e0a-1f40-4da2-8607-625c1b5b265a&amp;propName=kfor.com&amp;hostURL=http://www.kfor.com&amp;swfPath=http://kfor.vid.trb.com/player/&amp;omAccount=triblocaltvglobal&amp;omnitureServer=kfor.com" align="middle" bgcolor="#ffffff" name="PaperVideoTest"></embed></object><br />
Studies are showing increasing evidence there may be a link between  certain chemicals and obesity. A new study found overweight young girls  had significantly higher levels of phthalates than the general  population of children. Phthalates are found in plastics and can be  hormone disruptors.</p>
<p>Nutritionist Keith Bishop of Oklahoma City says these disruptors can  cause all sorts of problems, &#8220;The plastics attach to receptors on the  cells. If it&#8217;s a fat cell, it can stimulate that cell to grow and get  bigger.&#8221;</p>
<p>These plastics can also attach to the thyroid, according to Bishop,  causing metabolism problems.</p>
<p>Bishop suggests steering clear of food wrapped or stored in plastic.</p>
<p>He suggests eating fresh or frozen fruits and vegetables and using  stainless steel or caste iron cookware.</p>
<p>The non-stick pans may contain chemicals that leach into food.</p>
<p>Some other things to also be warned about, the lining of tin cans and  the lining in microwave popcorn.</p>
<p>Article found <a href="http://www.kfor.com/health/sns-health-weight-loss-chemicals,0,595960.story" target="_blank">here.</a></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-2037"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->
<p class="FacebookLikeButton"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fsuperiorcleansing.com%2Fis-obesity-a-chemical-reaction%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;locale=en_US" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height: 60px"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superiorcleansing.com/is-obesity-a-chemical-reaction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New study: a common flame retardant causes infertility</title>
		<link>http://superiorcleansing.com/new-study-a-common-flame-retardant-causes-infertility/</link>
		<comments>http://superiorcleansing.com/new-study-a-common-flame-retardant-causes-infertility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Iacono</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Isagenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flame retardant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superiorcleansing.com/?p=1727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flame retardant and pregnant women (NaturalNews) So many US women have difficulty becoming pregnant that the fertility industry has become a huge business, raking in between three and five billion dollars a year. Now a new study published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives raises the possibility that a lot of women who can&#8217;t have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><div class="mceTemp">
<dl id="attachment_1729" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://superiorcleansing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/FlameRetardantSymbol1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1729" title="FlameRetardantSymbol" src="http://superiorcleansing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/FlameRetardantSymbol1-300x300.jpg" alt="chemicals" width="300" height="300" /></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd">Flame retardant and pregnant women</dd>
</dl>
<p>(NaturalNews) So many US women have difficulty becoming pregnant that the fertility industry has become a huge business, raking in between three and five billion dollars a year. Now a new study published in the journal <em>Environmental Health Perspectives</em> raises the possibility that a lot of women who can&#8217;t have babies could have flame retardant chemicals to blame &#8212; specifically, <em>polybrominated diphenyl ethers</em> (PBDEs), which are commonly found in an alarming number of household consumer products.</p>
<p>In a study involving over 200 women, researchers at the University of California at Berkeley (UC Berkeley) discovered that women with higher blood concentrations of PBDEs took far longer to become pregnant than those with low amounts of the chemicals in their blood. In fact, for every ten-fold increase in blood levels of four PBDE chemicals tested, there was a 30 percent decrease in the odds a woman would conceive a child during a month.</p>
<p>&#8220;There have been numerous animal studies that have found a range of health effects from exposure to PBDEs, but very little research has been done in humans. This latest paper is the first to address the impact on human fertility, and the results are surprisingly strong. These findings need to be replicated, but they have important implications for regulators,&#8221; the study&#8217;s lead author, Kim Harley, said in a statement to the media. Harley is an adjunct assistant professor of maternal and child health and associate director of the Center for Children&#8217;s Environmental Health Research at UC Berkeley&#8217;s School of Public Health.</p>
<p>PBDEs are a class of <em>organobromine compounds</em> found in foam furniture, electronics, fabrics, carpets, plastics and other common household items. They were commonly added to these and other products as flame retardants after the 1970s when new fire safety standards were implemented in the US.</p>
<p>So how big is the problem of homes contaminated by PBDEs? Unfortunately, it appears to be huge. The chemicals are known to leach out into the environment and accumulate in human fat cells. Previous studies have suggested that 97 percent of U.S. residents have detectable levels of PBDEs in their blood and that the levels in Americans are 20 times higher than in their counterparts in Europe.</p>
<p>The most prevalent form of PBDEs found in the blood of women participating in the UC Berkeley study were from a specific formulation known as a <em>pentaBDE</em> mixture. Both this kind of PBDE and another type, <em>octaBDE</em>, have been banned for use in several states &#8212; but they are still widely found in products manufactured before 2004.</p>
<p>The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finally got around to addressing the danger of PBDEs at the end of 2009. Did the agency issue an urgent alarm about products containing the chemicals &#8212; even ban them outright to protect consumers? No. Instead, the EPA quietly announced an agreement with three major manufacturers of some forms of PBDEs to phase out production by 2013. Unfortunately, this is clearly too little too late to protect countless Americans from the potential danger of these contaminants.</p>
<p>&#8220;Although several types of PBDEs are being phased out in the United States, our exposure to the flame retardants is likely to continue for many years,&#8221; said the study&#8217;s principal investigator, Brenda Eskenazi, UC Berkeley professor of epidemiology and of maternal and child health at the School of Public Health. &#8220;PBDEs are present in many consumer products, and we know they leach out into our homes. In our research, we have found that low-income children in California are exposed to very high levels of PBDEs, and this has us concerned about the next generation of Californians.&#8221;</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, the scientists pointed out in the press statement that there&#8217;s reason to be concerned about additional chemical contaminants in the immediate future. True, PBDEs are being phased out from consumer products &#8212; but they are being replaced with other potentially toxic compounds. &#8220;We know even less about the newer flame retardant chemicals that are coming out,&#8221; said Dr. Harley. &#8220;We just don&#8217;t have the human studies yet to show that they are safe.&#8221;</p></div>
<div class="mceTemp">For original article click <a href="http://www.naturalnews.com/028074_flame_retardants_infertility.html" target="_blank">here.</a></div>
<div class="shr-publisher-1727"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->
<p class="FacebookLikeButton"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fsuperiorcleansing.com%2Fnew-study-a-common-flame-retardant-causes-infertility%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;locale=en_US" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height: 60px"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superiorcleansing.com/new-study-a-common-flame-retardant-causes-infertility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fat Epidemic Linked To Chemicals Run Amok</title>
		<link>http://superiorcleansing.com/fat-epidemic-linked-to-chemicals-run-amok/</link>
		<comments>http://superiorcleansing.com/fat-epidemic-linked-to-chemicals-run-amok/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Iacono</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleansing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superiorcleansing.com/?p=1348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fat epidemic linked to chemicals run amok It&#8217;s not just about calories in versus calories out. If that were all it took to lose weight — eating a little less and exercising a little more — then weight loss would be as simple as grade-school math: Subtract Y from Z and end up with X. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><div class="mceTemp">
<dl id="attachment_1349" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://superiorcleansing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/burger.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1349" title="burger" src="http://superiorcleansing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/burger-300x175.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="175" /></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd">Fat epidemic linked to chemicals run amok</dd>
</dl>
<p>It&#8217;s not just about calories in versus calories out.</p>
<p>If that were all it took to lose weight — eating a little less and exercising a little more — then weight loss would be as simple as grade-school math: Subtract Y from Z and end up with X.</p>
<p>But if you&#8217;ve ever followed a <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35315651/ns/health-diet_and_nutrition/ns/health-diet_and_nutrition/#" target="_blank">diet program<img src="http://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/2_bing.gif" alt="" /></a> and achieved less than your desired result, you probably came away feeling frustrated, depressed, and maybe a bit guilty. What did I do wrong?</p>
<p>Instead of X, it&#8217;s XXL.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>Because there&#8217;s probably more at work here than just calories in/calories out. More and more research is indicating that America&#8217;s obesity crisis can&#8217;t be blamed entirely on too much fast food and too little exercise. (Or on these <a href="http://eatthis.menshealth.com/slideshow/7-habits-highly-obese-people?cm_mmc=MSNBC-_-100127-New%20America%20Diet-_-Article-_-ETNT%207%20Habits%20of%20highly%20obese">seven habits of highly obese people</a>.) A third factor may be in play: a class of natural and synthetic chemicals known as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), or as researchers have begun to call them, obesogens.</p>
<p><strong><strong>The new weight-gain threat<br />
</strong></strong>Obesogens are chemicals that disrupt the function of hormonal systems; many researchers believe they lead to weight gain and, in turn, numerous diseases that curse the American populace. They enter our bodies from a variety of sources — natural hormones found in soy products, hormones administered to animals, plastics in some food and drink packaging, ingredients added to processed foods, and pesticides sprayed on produce. They act in a variety of ways: by mimicking human hormones such as estrogen, by misprogramming stem cells to become fat cells and, researchers think, by altering the function of genes.</p>
<p>Endocrine disruptors are suspected of playing a role in fertility problems, genital malformation, reduced male birth rates, precocious puberty, miscarriage, behavior problems, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35315651/ns/health-diet_and_nutrition/ns/health-diet_and_nutrition/#" target="_blank">brain abnormalities<img src="http://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/2_bing.gif" alt="" /></a>, impaired immune function, various cancers, and cardiovascular disease. &#8220;We have data linking environmental chemicals to practically every major human disease, from cardiovascular disease to attention-deficit disorder,&#8221; says Jerry Heindel, Ph.D., an expert on EDCs at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS). <a href="http://www.menshealth.com/men/health/other-diseases-ailments/industrial-pollution-health-hazards/article/442a7febcb6c4210vgnvcm10000030281eac?cm_mmc=MSNBC-_-100127-New%20America%20Diet-_-Article-_-Lost%20boys%20of%20aamjiwnaag">Discover the frightening health problems EDCs have caused on one Canadian Indian reserve</a>.</p>
<p>Now new research is finding that some EDCs, the obesogens, may be helping to make us fat. This field of research is dominated by animal and test-tube studies. And while researchers note that the known effects of many obesogens are more potent in the unborn and newly born, some suspect a similar impact on adults.</p>
<p>This combination of factors, along with our growing tendency to put on weight, is what we call the obesogen effect. Understanding it could be the key to freeing ourselves from weight gain and the other hazards of these chemicals.</p>
<p><strong><strong>Why traditional diets don&#8217;t work<br />
</strong></strong>Decades ago, before big, soft guts were the norm in the United States, we referred to overweight people as having &#8220;glandular problems.&#8221; Their weight was not their fault, doctors explained; their bodies just didn&#8217;t have the ability to fight off weight gain like most people&#8217;s bodies did.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t use that polite phrase any longer. What changed? Now that about two-thirds of American adults are overweight or obese, did those folks with &#8220;glandular problems&#8221; disappear? No; it&#8217;s just that many others have caught the same disease. Thanks to the obesogen effect, we may all be at risk for some glandular problems.</p>
<p>Because it&#8217;s probably been a while since you took high-school anatomy, here&#8217;s a quick refresher: Your endocrine system is the contingent of glands producing the hormones that regulate your <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35315651/ns/health-diet_and_nutrition/ns/health-diet_and_nutrition/#" target="_blank">body</a>. Growth and development, sexual function, reproductive processes, mood, sleep, hunger, stress, metabolism — they&#8217;re all controlled by hormones. And the pancreas, hypothalamus, adrenal glands, thyroid, pituitary gland, and testes are all part of that system. So whether you&#8217;re male or female, tall or short, hirsute or hairless, lean or heavy — that&#8217;s all determined in a big way by your endocrine system.</p>
<p>Your endocrine system is a finely tuned instrument that can easily be thrown out of kilter. &#8220;Obesogens are thought to act by hijacking the regulatory systems that control body weight,&#8221; says Frederick vom Saal, Ph.D., curators&#8217; professor of biological sciences at the University of Missouri. &#8220;And any chemical that interferes with body weight is an endocrine disruptor.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why obesogens seem to be good at making us fat — and why researchers are so bent on uncovering the truth about these chemicals. The NIEHS is funding studies that target them. The Endocrine Society, the largest organization for hormone research and clinical endocrinology, has also noted the connection. &#8220;The <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35315651/ns/health-diet_and_nutrition/ns/health-diet_and_nutrition/#" target="_blank">rise</a> in the incidence in obesity matches the rise in the use and distribution of industrial chemicals that may be playing a role in generation of obesity,&#8221; it stated in a recent report, &#8220;suggesting that EDCs may be linked to this epidemic.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s one reason why weight-loss advice may not always work. In fact, even strictly following the smartest traditional advice won&#8217;t lower your obesogen exposure. See, an apple a day may have kept the doctor away 150 years ago. But if that apple now comes with chemicals believed to promote obesity, then that advice is way out of date. In fact, apples have been named one of the most pesticide-laden produce choices out there.</p>
<p>The obesogen effect may be part of the reason why traditional dieting practices — choosing chicken over beef, eating more fish, loading up on fruits and vegetables — may not work anymore.</p>
<p>But as we began researching our book, &#8220;The New American Diet,&#8221; we found some good news: There&#8217;s no reason why our favorite foods — steak, burgers, pasta, ice cream — can&#8217;t be part of a reasonable weight-loss program. We just need to move past the old thinking, and adopt some new laws of leanness.</p>
</div>
<div class="shr-publisher-1348"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->
<p class="FacebookLikeButton"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fsuperiorcleansing.com%2Ffat-epidemic-linked-to-chemicals-run-amok%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;locale=en_US" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height: 60px"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superiorcleansing.com/fat-epidemic-linked-to-chemicals-run-amok/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Environmental Exposure to Hairspray, Lipstick and Pollution Can Trigger Arthritis</title>
		<link>http://superiorcleansing.com/environmental-exposure-to-hairspray-lipstick-and-pollution-can-trigger-arthritis/</link>
		<comments>http://superiorcleansing.com/environmental-exposure-to-hairspray-lipstick-and-pollution-can-trigger-arthritis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Iacono</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Isagenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleansing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hairspray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superiorcleansing.com/?p=1213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The links between autoimmune diseases, infections and the environment are complex and mysterious. But &#8220;Spondylo-arthropathies,&#8221; a group of common inflammatory rheumatic disorders, appear to be triggered by environmental factors. Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease afflicting more than 2 million Americans. The disorder causes your body&#8217;s own immune system to attack your joints, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p><a href="http://superiorcleansing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/lipstick.bmp"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1212" title="lipstick" src="http://superiorcleansing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/lipstick.bmp" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>The links between autoimmune diseases, infections and the environment are complex and mysterious.</p>
<p>But &#8220;Spondylo-arthropathies,&#8221; a group of common inflammatory rheumatic disorders, appear to be triggered by environmental factors.</p>
<p>Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease afflicting more than 2 million Americans.</p>
<p>The disorder causes your body&#8217;s own immune system to attack your joints, leading to pain, deformities and a substantial loss of mobility.</p>
<p>One root cause of arthritis is extreme stress, and some medications, such as the birth control pills, might be linked in some cases to the onset of lupus.</p>
<p>Environmental pollution is also a concern for those predisposed to an autoimmune disease. Second-hand smoke, food chemicals or chemicals in the air, jet fuel fumes, UV exposure and other forms of environmental pollution are amongst the triggers considered to provoke the onset of autoimmune diseases. Hairspray and lipstick are also known to be occasional triggers.</p>
<p>For original post click <a title="Environental toxins" href="http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/02/11/environmental-exposure-to-hairspray-lipstick-and-pollution-can-trigger-arthritis.aspx" target="_blank">here.</a></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-1213"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->
<p class="FacebookLikeButton"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fsuperiorcleansing.com%2Fenvironmental-exposure-to-hairspray-lipstick-and-pollution-can-trigger-arthritis%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;locale=en_US" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height: 60px"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superiorcleansing.com/environmental-exposure-to-hairspray-lipstick-and-pollution-can-trigger-arthritis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video: My First Year of Nutritional Cleansing</title>
		<link>http://superiorcleansing.com/video-my-first-year-of-nutritional-cleansing/</link>
		<comments>http://superiorcleansing.com/video-my-first-year-of-nutritional-cleansing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Iacono</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Isagenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleanse Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colon CLeanse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutritional Cleansing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superiorcleansing.com/?p=1161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My sister posted this video on Facebook and I definitely felt it was blog-worthy.  Watch the results these people are getting and let me know what you think.  For me, I know what cleansing has done for my body, so this is nothing new.  However, YOU need to understand what cleansing can do for YOU. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p>My sister posted this video on Facebook and I definitely felt it was blog-worthy.  Watch the results these people are getting and let me know what you think.  For me, I know what cleansing has done for my body, so this is nothing new.  However, YOU need to understand what cleansing can do for YOU.</p>
<p>You are doing yourself a huge disservice by not opening your mind to it.  Please leave comments.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="525" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RAE8XfAxsO4&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x006699&amp;color2=0x54abd6" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="525" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RAE8XfAxsO4&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x006699&amp;color2=0x54abd6" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-1161"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->
<p class="FacebookLikeButton"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fsuperiorcleansing.com%2Fvideo-my-first-year-of-nutritional-cleansing%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;locale=en_US" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height: 60px"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superiorcleansing.com/video-my-first-year-of-nutritional-cleansing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is Nutritional Cleansing More Important Than Ever?</title>
		<link>http://superiorcleansing.com/why-is-nutritional-cleansing-more-important-than-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://superiorcleansing.com/why-is-nutritional-cleansing-more-important-than-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Iacono</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Isagenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Cleanse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buddhist Monks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cabo San Lucas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cigarette Smoke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleanse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colon CLeanse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detoxify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drinking Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Favorite Restaurant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golf Cart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healing Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Isagenix Cleanse Safe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Isagenix Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Isagenix Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landscape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lungs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mahi Mahi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutritional Cleansing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxygen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perennial Spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rich Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctuary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spring Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tibet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ultimate Place]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superiorcleansing.com/?p=983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just today I was walking through the trail of exhaust left from a golf cart making it&#8217;s way up the hill in front of me.  I kept thinking to myself, &#8220;when is this trail of exhaust going to end?&#8221;  The thought kept going through my mind &#8220;this cannot be good to keep breathing this, especially [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p>Just today I was walking through the trail of exhaust left from a golf cart making it&#8217;s way up the hill in front of me.  I kept thinking to myself, &#8220;when is this trail of exhaust going to end?&#8221;  The thought kept going through my mind &#8220;this cannot be good to keep breathing this, especially while my lungs are expanding for oxygen&#8221; due to the steep climb up the hill.</p>
<p>The point is that no matter where we go in our <strong>modern environment</strong>, there will ALWAYS be areas of toxicity that are almost impossible to avoid.  Here&#8217;s another example:  I was with my wife at our favorite restaurant here in Cabo San Lucas enjoying some good Mahi Mahi we&#8217;d just caught when the person at the table next to us pulled out a cigarette and was almost blowing it in our faces!  My wife started caughing because she is allergic to cigarette smoke, but this was something we couldn&#8217;t have avoided because we were right in the middle of dinner and it was so unexpected.</p>
<p>I enjoyed reading the article below which I believe is relative to the point I am trying to make.  Please leave your comments under this post to let me know how you feel:</p>
<div id="attachment_984" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://superiorcleansing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/John-Anderson-Formulating-Isagenix-Products.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-984" title="John-Anderson-Formulating-Isagenix-Products" src="http://superiorcleansing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/John-Anderson-Formulating-Isagenix-Products-300x225.jpg" alt="John Anderson, Isagenix Formulator" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">John Anderson Formulating Isagenix Products</p></div>
<blockquote><p><span style="color: #000000;">Situated at the summit of an auspicious mountain is the glorious Yumbulagang palace, the oldest palace in Tibet, with more than 2,000 years of history as a spiritual and healing center for kings and Dalai Lamas. Nowadays the palace is still a sanctuary for Buddhist monks and travelers alike who hope to take in the sublime views of the landscape below. The surrounding valley is so pristine and beautiful that legend has it that drinking water from a perennial spring found there will cure any disease.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;"><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">You could say the palace is an ultimate place of purification where one can drink in pure spring water, breathe in pure air and enjoy health-giving foods grown from the nutrient-rich earth in the region. If you happen to be a monk living there, then you probably don’t need <strong><a title="Nutritional Cleansing Isagenix" href="http://aiacono.isagenix.com/us/en/thirtyday.dhtml" target="_blank">nutritional cleansing.</a></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">As for the rest of us, we live in a completely different world. In our daily lives our bodies are under constant onslaught of stressors that come in the form of <strong>pollutants</strong>—via food, water and air—from a poor diet, and from the stress of busy schedules, conflict and strain at work, conflict in relationships, and even conflict in traffic. There’s little doubt that traditional nutritional thinking won’t cover our needs. We need extra help for helping us guard our bodies, help us to <strong>detoxify</strong> and to lose weight. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Now, there is plenty of reason to be leery of claims regarding safe, long-term weight loss and optimum health after being subjected to hundreds of  “miracle” fad diets over the years. Whenever I hear about someone who has lost a lot of weight and has kept it off for longer than a few months with little effort, I’m the first to find the story just a little too hard to believe.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">I know also that I receive a variety of e-mails questioning the need for nutritional cleansing. Most come from high skepticism because the simple fact is that “<strong>most diets don’t work.</strong>” But just as you may have discovered since trying nutritional cleansing, the whole-system approach that Isagenix provides does work, and it contains the right nutrients and botanicals given at the right time for maximum support to the body.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Ask a Tibetan monk about health and he’d tell you that you mustn’t lose faith in the body’s capability to produce miracles. <strong><a title="Isagenix a Miracle?" href="http://superiorcleansing.com/isagenix/" target="_blank">Isagenix</a></strong> may not be exactly a miracle—the system was created with careful research and design—but just ask anyone who has witnessed or experienced his or her own success story and you might just agree Isagenix is a phenomenon. And, we have it to share with the world.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #000000;">Bill Wheeler, Ph.D., ACSM<br />
Isagenix Chief Science Officer</span></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>I thought this &#8220;Are You Toxic&#8221; video by Isagenix was perfect for this post.</strong></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="500" height="375" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YzeCOAKY-Xo&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x006699&amp;color2=0x54abd6" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="375" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YzeCOAKY-Xo&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x006699&amp;color2=0x54abd6" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-983"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->
<p class="FacebookLikeButton"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fsuperiorcleansing.com%2Fwhy-is-nutritional-cleansing-more-important-than-ever%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;locale=en_US" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height: 60px"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superiorcleansing.com/why-is-nutritional-cleansing-more-important-than-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ISAGENIX: 30 Day Cleanse&#8230;12th Day results!</title>
		<link>http://superiorcleansing.com/isagenix-30-day-cleanse-12th-day-results/</link>
		<comments>http://superiorcleansing.com/isagenix-30-day-cleanse-12th-day-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Wilson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Isagenix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutritional Cleansing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://superiorcleansing.com/?p=515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lets see&#8230;I&#8217;m trying to think of any reason why we as Americans should be alarmed about our current obesity epidemic. I just can&#8217;t seem to come up with anything&#8230;It really can&#8217;t be as bad as the media reports, could it? I mean, seriously, what health problems could simply being overweight possibly cause? Frankly, I think [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetTop Automatic --><p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-521" title="Obesity-risks" src="http://superiorcleansing.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Obesity-risks.jpg" alt="Obesity-risks" width="262" height="262" />Lets see&#8230;I&#8217;m trying to think of any reason why we as Americans should be alarmed about our <em><strong>current</strong> <strong>obesity epidemic</strong></em>. I just can&#8217;t seem to come up with anything&#8230;It really can&#8217;t be as bad as the media reports, could it? I mean, seriously, what health problems could simply being overweight possibly cause? Frankly, I think the urgent concern about the rapidly <a href="http://www.health-and-wellness-delivered.com/obesity.html" target="_blank"><em><strong>increasing obesity problem </strong></em></a>in this country is probably over hyped&#8230;don&#8217;t you think?</p>
<p>Of course, I&#8217;m being facetious with the above remarks&#8230;a sort of satire to awaken our dulled senses to the urgency of change. Just a quick glance at the shocking chart to the right and I think our senses can be jolted back to the reality that<em><strong> this growing health dilemma will soon reach Tsunami proportion</strong></em> if America does not&#8230;can i say&#8230;repent?</p>
<p>Repent from what&#8230;you might ask? Repent from the insatiable quest for excess&#8230;excess related to food consumption, that is. We literally&#8230;and I&#8217;m included in this&#8230;do not know when to say &#8220;NO!&#8221; NO!&#8230;I will not consume 4,ooo calories just for lunch&#8230;NO!&#8230;I will not continue to eat Mexican food every day for dinner! (yes, I have done this!)</p>
<p>The point I&#8217;m trying to make is this&#8230;If we were the same country today that we were 100 years ago, we would understand the meaning of <em><strong>MODERATION.</strong></em> You remember watching your grandparents save everything? Mine would pack up leftovers no matter how little was left. They would SAVE their money for something instead of taking out a line of credit for everything. They would &#8220;get by&#8221;&#8230;and be HAPPY!</p>
<p>I concur that there are occasionally other contributing factors to issues of obesity; however, the core of the issue with obesity is in primarily defined by two contributors: <em><strong>excess of food consumption, and condition of food consumed.</strong></em></p>
<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-525" title="overeating-obesity" src="http://superiorcleansing.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/overeating-obesity-300x271.jpg" alt="overeating-obesity" width="240" height="187" /><strong>First</strong>, we are an over-consuming nation as compared to the amount of food consumed by other countries. There is as much as 2,000 calories in most fast food combos&#8230;and that is just for lunch. Alright, forget the combo&#8230;what about the spaghetti for dinner? do we stop after one helping? Not usually. We have educated our bodies to <em><strong>keep going till we can&#8217;t eat anymore</strong></em>&#8230;then we are &#8220;done.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Secondly</strong>&#8230;and this point I feel is <strong>the real culprit behind the obesity epidemic</strong>&#8230;not only are we daily consuming more food than is necessary, the food we are consuming is an imposter! It isn&#8217;t really food anyway&#8230;it just poses as food! It is so chemically enhanced, steroid-injected, sodium-saturated, and high fructose corn &#8220;syruped&#8221; up, that our food has become un-nutritional. This is the real &#8220;<strong>OZ</strong>&#8221; behind the curtain&#8230;<strong>the real instigator of obesity&#8230;<em><a href="http://www.health-and-wellness-delivered.com/standard-american-diet.html" target="_blank">impurities</a></em>! </strong></p>
<p>These toxins are the &#8220;<strong>illegal aliens</strong>&#8221; that our bodies have no idea what to do with. The body simply enshrouds the toxin in fat until it can figure out some way of getting rid of it. In the mean time, these &#8220;illegals&#8221; camp out on your body as excess weight.</p>
<p>You get it now? <em><strong>LOSE THE IMPURITIES&#8230;LOSE THE WEIGHT!</strong></em></p>
<p>Folks&#8230;OBESITY IS NO LONGER ALLOWED TO DEFINE YOU! Declare war on obesity and on your toxins and experience the benefits of nutritional cleansing with <a href="http://comeandsee.isagenix.com/us/en/home.dhtml" target="_blank"><em><strong>ISAGENIX</strong></em></a>.</p>
<p>The results today are reflective of a &#8220;<strong>don&#8217;t try this at home</strong>&#8221; method that backfired on me. I had a challenging day at work, drank my first shake later than usual&#8230;around 12 p.m&#8230;.which put my entire day too far ahead of itself to where I was having my last shake around 9 p.m. I also didn&#8217;t walk until 9:30 p.m. which confused every part of me that is contributing to the success of this cleanse! <strong>This is not S.O.P!</strong></p>
<p><em><strong>I believe the </strong></em><strong>Isagenix Cleanse</strong><em><strong> works best if each meal is spread out to where your body is being fed more often.</strong></em> Example being,  1-2 ounces of <a href="http://comeandsee.isagenix.com/us/en/ionixsupreme.dhtml" target="_blank"><em><strong>Ionix Supreme</strong></em></a> first thing in the morning. Take a walk early, followed by the first <a href="http://comeandsee.isagenix.com/us/en/isaleanshake_new.dhtml" target="_blank"><em><strong>IsaLean Shake</strong></em></a>&#8230;then several hours later 250-300 of the 600 calories alotted, followed several hours later by the other 250-300 calories. conclude the day around 5-7 p.m. with the final shake.</p>
<p>Well folks&#8230;this has been long but important. I truly desire, not only for myself, but for everyone in the trenches battling the enemy of excess weight&#8230;and the health challenges that come with it, to win not just the battle, but the war.</p>
<p>Your quote&#8230;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: #000000;"><em><strong>&#8220;You pray  for good health and a body that will be strong in old age. Good &#8212; </strong></em></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: #000000;"><em><strong>but your rich  foods block the gods&#8217;answer and tie </strong><strong>Jupiter&#8217;s hands.&#8221;</strong></em><br />
<strong> </strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: #000000;"><strong><span style="color: #666600;">- </span></strong></span><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; color: #666600;"><strong>Persius </strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>George</p>
<p><a href="http://superiorcleansing.com/contact-us/" target="_blank"><span style="text-decoration: underline; color: #0000ff;">Contact Me</span></a> for more info!</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-515"></div><!-- Start Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic --><!-- End Shareaholic LikeButtonSetBottom Automatic -->
<p class="FacebookLikeButton"><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fsuperiorcleansing.com%2Fisagenix-30-day-cleanse-12th-day-results%2F&amp;layout=button_count&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;locale=en_US" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height: 60px"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://superiorcleansing.com/isagenix-30-day-cleanse-12th-day-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

